I was standing in one of the most packed rooms I'd seen at the BlogHer conference. No, It wasn't one of the famous parties, it was the session titled "Sponsored or Unsponsored - Blogging for $$ - Where Do You Stand?"
The standing room only crowd that spilled out into the hallway was there to address one of the biggest issues at the conference - how can advertisers/brands and bloggers work together to spread the word about products.
There are really two big issues around bloggers and brands working together:
- Transparency - Are the brand and blogger being fully transparent about any incentives - i.e. if the blogger received free stuff or was compensated in some way. (and yes, there's the whole FTC thing which is a whole other blog post)
- Influencing Opinion - Is what the blogger writes some how influenced/tainted by that free stuff or incentive
Transparency
All I'm going to say on transparency is that it's the smart way to go. It removes any sense that you are somehow hiding something.
There's another plus to transparency. Clearly labeling content as "sponsored" can actually boost readership to that page. BlogHer says that their Special Offers and Sponsored Content section is one of the most visited on their site.
I've heard from other bloggers who also claim their clearly labeled "Sponsored Content" is popular with their readers. Women are often the Chief Purchasing Officers. They want to know what cool, new, quality products are out there and what women like them are saying about those products.
Influencing Opinion
I think this is the more interesting and important question - by giving away free stuff or otherwise compensating bloggers, are brands influencing the blogger's opinion about that product?
In a recent Ad Age article about BlogHer - a commenter had this to say:
What's surprising, to me at least, is the complete shamelessness of hosting an event in which the integrity of "mommy bloggers" is so obviously "for sale" at the exact same time that these same bloggers are attempting to paint themselves as having "integrity."
You've either got integrity (which means that you're not for sale) or you don't. There's no 50 percent solution here.
The commenter's words are pretty harsh - but I suspect he is voicing what many people may be thinking. So let me address this.
Are mom bloggers selling their integrity?
If you know mom bloggers like I do, the short answer is - No.
There's an important distinction here between:
- Incentivising someone to write about your product, and
- Incentivising them to say something they don't believe
Number 1 involves selling your opinion. Number 2 involves selling your integrity.
I can't speak for every single mom blogger, but there are specific reasons why I believe most mom bloggers will not sell their integrity, i.e. lie and share a positive opinion of a product that they don't actually have.
Why most mom bloggers can not be bought
- Loss of credibility - If she shares a positive review of a product that she does not like, and her readers don't like it - she instantly loses credibility. She is no longer a trusted source of information.
- Loss of relationship - These mom bloggers work hard to build up a trusted relationship with their readers. We're often talking years and hundreds of posts and thousands of interactions with readers. This relationship with their readers matters more to the these bloggers than almost anything else in their lives. She is NOT going to blow that just for a free mop or a trip to to a conference.
Negative reviews
Several bloggers at the session say they do not work with/accept products from brands they don't like.
I have also heard from mom bloggers who say that once they try a product, if they feel negatively about it, they simply won't post a review. I'm seeing this start to change. As one blogger put it - "I simply say: this product is right for you if.....this product is not right for you if....." Constructive criticism is an important part of any review.
But while I have heard of bloggers who don't like to post negative reviews, I have never heard of a blogger who felt negatively about a product, but posted a positive review.
Compensation for her time, NOT her opinion
Ask most mom bloggers who charge some sort of fee, and what you'll hear is that you are compensating her for her time - the time she spent researching, writing, setting up the free giveaway on her site. These women take this seriously and put a lot of their valuable time into it. They feel it is only fair to compensate them for that time.
Final thoughts
There's a lot of work and discussion that needs to take place around this subject. I hope conferences like BlogHer and other forums will continue to allow conversations between advertisers/brands and bloggers about how we can all work together to share honest, authentic, transparent information, experiences and opinions.
This is going to continue to be important since women are more than twice as likely to go to blogs versus social network sites when seeking information, advice and recommendations.
Nice post.I also agree with your viewpoints.Conferences and forums like these ones will only create a healthy relationship between advertisers/brands and bloggers.
Posted by: website design company | August 05, 2009 at 07:42 AM
Great post. Keep it coming. I have bookmarked your page.
Posted by: DK | August 05, 2009 at 11:57 AM
Great post! I want to say that the comment about "This product is for you if...or this product is not for you if.." quote came from Amy Lupold Bair of www.resourcefulmommy.com
I'm sure she would appreciate the quote credit. :-)
Posted by: Haley | August 06, 2009 at 01:53 PM
Awesome post. Felt like you were inside my head. Giving me something will totally influence me to write about it. But what I write is completely mine.
Posted by: Amy O. | August 06, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Haley - thank you for the quote attribution - It was a great line- happy we can give credit where credit is due.
Posted by: Holly Buchanan | August 09, 2009 at 03:59 PM
I just found this post and it's really interesting. I'm sorry I missed that panel - no doubt I'd have had a lot to say!
I agree somewhat that you think a blogger should be compensated for her time and not her opinion - but that's a tricky one if you're talking specifically about product reviews. Because what you end up with most of the time is a blog with no clear pov, no clear brand, that just seems to feature (generally positively) whatever product came in the mail that day and was willing to send $25 over through paypal.
If advertisers really want to compensate bloggers, why not buy ads on their blogs? That way the content can remain about the bloggers passions...not about the blogger's need to make money.
Isn't that why we all read them in the first place?
Posted by: Mom101 | August 28, 2009 at 10:27 AM
Thanks for the post.Really liked reading this post of yours.You have raised an important issue in this post.Look forward to more such posts from you.
Posted by: web development | October 13, 2009 at 08:00 AM
Good to read this post.I always get to learn a lot about the present market scenario from your post.
Posted by: website design | December 26, 2009 at 07:23 AM
Hey it’s so nice I really want to appreciate to this site. It’s so much interesting matter I like your work. Please carry on with your work and post me such a wonderful article. For the more information visit on nexpider.com
Posted by: Seo Services | January 27, 2010 at 11:45 PM
I am very happy I came across this post. I am always looking for this kind of information. I blog all the time, and I really wish it was more about the content, and not the money. But, you gotta do what you gotta do. I appreciate it and I will be back!
Posted by: Susanna "Long To Stay At Home" S. | May 05, 2011 at 08:41 PM
This is a very good post. Hope to read more next time! Thank you very much, Mathias
Posted by: Mathias | July 20, 2011 at 04:08 PM
This is a great article it shows every information or advice I needs for a basic but good as a professional marketing strategy.
Posted by: Richard F. Sands | March 01, 2012 at 05:48 AM
That's pretty enaadcvd pancake art.I do a lot of happyfaces and bears (hint a bear is a happyface with ears), though I do have the claim to fame of laying down the facial features first, cooking them, then doing the background' over top, so that it's a two-color deal.BTW, your pancakes look like they are cooked in way too much oil. Super delicious, but Mr Artery will be cross with you!
Posted by: Alexander | March 17, 2012 at 08:23 PM
The information given regarding male vs female was a fun read. There are so many things that can make a difference.
Posted by: Nike shoes | June 28, 2012 at 02:57 AM
aapki ye post un logo ke muh pe tamacha hai jo scotahe hai kipadai keval mahangi school me hi hoti hai .kabhi kabhi hum jinko nasamjh mante hai wahi hume sahi rasta dikha de te hain .
Posted by: Enes | July 18, 2012 at 02:25 PM
http://www.vaultoakleys.com Oakley Vault
http://www.vaultoakley2012.com Oakley Vault Sunglasses
http://www.vaultoakleys.com Oakleys
http://www.vaultoakley2012.com Cheap Oakley Vault
Posted by: oakley military | July 19, 2012 at 02:04 AM
dear Nishant jiNamaskarArticle ke saath prakashit karne hetu Kya Aapko OSHO ki teesvar chahiye?Mere paas high resolution photographs hain. I can send you by email, if you want.Are you interested in music, then i will send you Ma Osho Priya's bhajan albums.please send me your postal address.Thanks.-osho shailendra
Posted by: Lyka | July 19, 2012 at 03:35 AM